<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Firefox and some on memory leaks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geek.co.il/wp/2007/12/09/more-on-firefox-and-some-on-memory-leaks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geek.co.il/wp/2007/12/09/more-on-firefox-and-some-on-memory-leaks</link>
	<description>Thoughts about the universe in general</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 09:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19978</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guss</title>
		<link>http://geek.co.il/wp/2007/12/09/more-on-firefox-and-some-on-memory-leaks/comment-page-1#comment-114304</link>
		<dc:creator>Guss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geek.co.il/wp/2007/12/09/more-on-firefox-and-some-on-memory-leaks/#comment-114304</guid>
		<description>Stuart - I just noticed that its actually you that commented on my blog :-/ yea, I suck. But I still stand by all of what I said.

Anyway, thanks for coming over and commenting :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart &#8211; I just noticed that its actually you that commented on my blog :-/ yea, I suck. But I still stand by all of what I said.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for coming over and commenting <img src='http://geek.co.il/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guss</title>
		<link>http://geek.co.il/wp/2007/12/09/more-on-firefox-and-some-on-memory-leaks/comment-page-1#comment-114154</link>
		<dc:creator>Guss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geek.co.il/wp/2007/12/09/more-on-firefox-and-some-on-memory-leaks/#comment-114154</guid>
		<description>Ok, I updated the last paragraph - Peter claims some fixed are going to be in Firefox 3, but I don&#039;t think there is any significant change in Firefox 3 beta (see also http://blog.pavlov.net/2007/11/19/firefox-3-beta-1/ ) and we don&#039;t know anything about the release (I&#039;m pretty sure Firefox would not get any major memory management work otherwise they&#039;re not going to make the roadmap).

One problem I have with the opinions of Firefox developers is that they tend to characterize Firefox memory issues as insignificant (in the first link in your comment - [About larger caches:] It worked great but caused us to use a bit more memory), while at the same time characterizing fixes that result in small improvement to the memory problems as huge fixes that have a lot of impact. 

I hope that version 3 will see a lot of improvement - especially for the many tabs use case, but as I don&#039;t think that Peter&#039;s use case of 20 tabs is large - I regularly have 20 tabs or more open in the browser (yay session manager!) and my girlfriend sometimes has over a hundred tabs at the same time - I also don&#039;t think that the Firefox team would succeed in doing what they failed miserably at for the last 5 years: delivering solutions to users needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I updated the last paragraph &#8211; Peter claims some fixed are going to be in Firefox 3, but I don&#8217;t think there is any significant change in Firefox 3 beta (see also <a href="http://blog.pavlov.net/2007/11/19/firefox-3-beta-1/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.pavlov.net/2007/11/19/firefox-3-beta-1/</a> ) and we don&#8217;t know anything about the release (I&#8217;m pretty sure Firefox would not get any major memory management work otherwise they&#8217;re not going to make the roadmap).</p>
<p>One problem I have with the opinions of Firefox developers is that they tend to characterize Firefox memory issues as insignificant (in the first link in your comment &#8211; [About larger caches:] It worked great but caused us to use a bit more memory), while at the same time characterizing fixes that result in small improvement to the memory problems as huge fixes that have a lot of impact. </p>
<p>I hope that version 3 will see a lot of improvement &#8211; especially for the many tabs use case, but as I don&#8217;t think that Peter&#8217;s use case of 20 tabs is large &#8211; I regularly have 20 tabs or more open in the browser (yay session manager!) and my girlfriend sometimes has over a hundred tabs at the same time &#8211; I also don&#8217;t think that the Firefox team would succeed in doing what they failed miserably at for the last 5 years: delivering solutions to users needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Parmenter</title>
		<link>http://geek.co.il/wp/2007/12/09/more-on-firefox-and-some-on-memory-leaks/comment-page-1#comment-114075</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Parmenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 20:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geek.co.il/wp/2007/12/09/more-on-firefox-and-some-on-memory-leaks/#comment-114075</guid>
		<description>I suggest reading http://blog.pavlov.net/2007/11/14/leaks-memory-we-never-forgot-about-you/ and http://blog.pavlov.net/2007/11/15/less-fragmentation-coming-in-firefox-3/ and rewriting your last paragraph :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest reading <a href="http://blog.pavlov.net/2007/11/14/leaks-memory-we-never-forgot-about-you/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.pavlov.net/2007/11/14/leaks-memory-we-never-forgot-about-you/</a> and <a href="http://blog.pavlov.net/2007/11/15/less-fragmentation-coming-in-firefox-3/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.pavlov.net/2007/11/15/less-fragmentation-coming-in-firefox-3/</a> and rewriting your last paragraph <img src='http://geek.co.il/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

